MOLD
AND FUNGAL CONTAMINATION
Mold and Fungal
Contamination is a blooming problem for all of us involved with
buying and selling homes. Jury
verdicts in excess of six figures have caught the industry’s
attention.
This
problem isn’t about a buyer complaining about a leaky roof or
about a backed up septic system – this is about people becoming
ill, in some cases seriously ill, and even dying.
WHAT
ARE THESE MOLDS?
They are often
referred to by the blanket term “Mold”, but they are actually
a combination of several different types of organisms. They are
types of microbial contaminants, primarily fungal in nature.
To put it in its
simplest terms – it’s similar to the mold you have seen
growing on a piece of old bread. With one minor exception – some
of these molds have been found to be toxic to humans and in high
enough concentrations can become fatal.
Molds reproduce
by forming and disseminating spores – sort of like little seeds
that float around in the air until they find a suitable
environment in which to grow. Their ideal environment is a warm,
moist, and dark location. (The interior walls of houses can be
ideal if moisture is present)
It is these
airborne “spores” that create the problem.
These spores are typically present in the air that you
breathe every single day, whether indoors or outside.
Normally – your body simply deals with them as it does
any other foreign organism, with your natural immune system
eliminating them.
The trouble seems
to start when two situations occur – but only one or the other
actually need be present for a problem to arise.
The first is a
susceptibility to these “molds” that can be caused by a
weakened or undeveloped immune system. The second is of course an
inordinately high concentration of mold spores within the
structure.
Newborn babies
and young infants do not always have fully developed immune
systems, hence – if a higher concentration develops in the
house, their systems may not be able to overcome and/or eliminate
the contaminants.
Seniors and those
with respiratory ailments also tend to have weakened defenses and
therefore have the same problem.
It is primarily
these two groups that have the highest rate of illness that can be
attributed to these contaminants.
It has also been
suggested that because these two groups also tend to spend a great
deal more time in their respective homes – that they tend to
have a much higher level of exposure.
This is not to
say that these are the only two groups at risk. Anyone at any age
can be affected, it is just that most of the cases of serious
illness that have so far been attributed to these types of
contaminants have occurred in these two groups.
The illnesses
that these “molds” can cause can be quite varied. They can
also be immune to antibiotics and other types of drug therapy. In
some cases – the only means for saving the patients life have
been surgical, including removing sections of lung, sinuses, and
in severe cases even part of the face and nose. – This is very,
very bad stuff.
|
The
primary threats to human health appear to be caused by
three specific types, Stachybotrys Chartarum, Penicillium,
and Asperigillus, not to say that there are not
others. The whole issue is relatively new and there is not
yet a lot of research on it. So I’d say we can expect
more to come. Although opinions vary widely as to
the toxicity of the different types of molds – the
general consensus is that Stachybotrys Chartarum is
by far the most dangerous. As with the cases of the infant
deaths in Cleveland as noted below, Stachybotrys
Chartarum primarily attacks the lungs and respiratory
tract and can cause severe hemorrhaging, and eventually
death.
|
Stachybotrys
(dark area) as found on drywall
 |
These molds seem
to affect humans by more than one method as well. In high enough
concentrations, they can literally “grow” inside of the lungs,
overwhelming the body’s immune system, and eventually covering
the lining of the lungs, preventing the body from receiving enough
oxygen and thereby causing death by asphyxiation.
In most cases
however it is the Mycotoxins that these particular
molds produce and carry within their spores that is the most
harmful. These Mycotoxins trigger severe allergic
reactions in some individuals; with the symptoms being quite
similar to those associated with severe influenza and can become
so severe that they result in death.
Furthermore –
even if the molds (Particularly Stachybotrys Chartarum) are
no longer active or alive – even the “dead” spores
themselves still contain Mycotoxins and can still be
a serious health threat when inhaled.
It is for this
last reason that the old thinking of “eliminate the moisture
and the problem is solved” no longer applies. Even dead,
dry, inactive molds can still cause serious illness and possibly
death in some individuals.
RECENT
COURT CASES
In a recent case
in Delaware, several tenants began noticing increased respiratory
problems. The apartment complex was tested and found to contain
higher levels of several contaminants including the “molds”.
After a lengthy trial and several expert witnesses, the
tenants were awarded a judgment of $1,0040,000.00. A seven figure
verdict for mold contamination!
In Cleveland,
Ohio, over a several year span, a particular area was experiencing
a rather high level of what at the time was being called “Sudden
infant death syndrome” or SIDS. There were numerous
investigations and even suggestions of infanticide being raised.
It was later discovered the cause of death was the high levels of Stachybotrys
Chartarum present in some of these homes. To date there have
been over 36 instances in Cleveland with over 16 infant deaths.
In one case – the only visible signs of any mold
contamination was one small spot the size of a “golf ball” –
but even that was enough.
In Nevada, there
have been several illnesses and one death that have been directly
attributed to these contaminants. This occurred in a condo
complex, where there had been a slow – imperceptible leak in one
of the common walls. The molds grew and the concentration level
became so high that one elderly person actually died of
asphyxiation from them.
The majority of
the cases have always seemed to be in older homes, with moisture
problems of some sort. But that is no longer true and in effect
– the worst is probably yet to come with more and more mold
contamination problems actually arising in the newer homes
currently being built. So much so – that we have heard of
situations where the local “Builder” trade groups have been
lobbying to be exempted from any type of liability by state
statute.
NEW
HOMES - GREATER RISK?
The homes you and
I grew up in were most likely built many years ago, before the
energy crisis and before the federal insulation requirements. They
were usually drafty and very energy inefficient. For that reason,
the air in the home generally changed out completely 2-6 times per
hour. Even if there was mold in our homes (which there probably
was) because of the constant air change – the concentration
levels most likely never got high enough to cause a problem.
Newer homes built
during the last decade have much more insulation, vapor seals,
super tight windows, and additional weather-stripping. The air in
them sometimes can take 4- 8 hours to change out completely.
For that reason
– with the amount of spores being produced being a constant and
sometimes actually increasing, the concentration level in a newer
– more energy efficient home can rise at a much faster level and
more easily reach a toxic or life–threatening level.
So why are the
“builders’ trying to have themselves insulated from any
liability - because the mold can literally be built right into the
house.
You’ve all seen
a new home being built. As it’s being framed out – sometimes
it rains. The wood gets wet. Do they wait for a week or two for
hot sunny weather to dry out the wood before they sheetrock it and
close it up? Not likely.
The wood is wet
and now that moisture is trapped inside the interior walls and
attic of the home. During the process it was exposed to the open
air and probably to various mold spores that occur naturally in
the outdoor air. We now have a very nice, warm, moist, and dark
environment – absolutely ideal for mold to grow in.
The ideal medium
or “food source” for these molds is anything with a high
cellulose and low nitrogen content.
For this reason – the favorite medium for these mold
spores to attach to is wood and paper products. House are perfect
for this because they are constructed with wood studs and then the
sheetrock has a nice paper backing on it.
RECOGNIZE
THE WARNING SIGNS
You need to
recognize the signs.
The first and key
indicator is any kind of damp or “musty” smell you notice when
entering the home.
If you have a
weakened immune system or respiratory problems, we recommend you
consider using an EPA- approved respiratory filter (breathing
mask) before further inspecting the property. Furthermore – some
sources have recommended that all exposed skin surfaces should be
immediately washed with soap and hot water if you come into direct
contact with mold.
Current opinions
we’ve heard all seem to agree that limited exposure causes no
threat to persons in normal good health. In fact - most of us are
exposed to these “molds” on a daily basis anyway as they are
typically present in most outdoor air.
KNOW
WHERE TO LOOK
Check under all
sinks, toilets, tubs, showers, water softeners, hot water heaters,
dishwashers, washing machines, refrigerators with ice makers, etc.
- Anything in the house that has or uses a water line.
You are looking
for green, gray and black discolorations. Sometimes they can be
quite faint. Also pay attention to any types of water stains
around these items.
Next check the
ceilings for signs of roof leaks. The more chronic or older the
leak appears to be – the more likely that there may be a mold
problem associated with it.
A commonly missed
source of moisture intrusion and accompanying mold contamination
is the exchanger/blower unit of the central air system. They are
usually mounted up in the ceilings and attic where they are seldom
seen or checked.
Due the method in
which they work – they often cause a condensation effect and
produce water that must be piped back out of the home. (A/C drip
line) These drain pipes are very easily clogged, and the result is
a water backup that overflows the drip pan and leaks into the
joists and rafters of the home.
Since these leaks
are usually very small – they don’t always result in a visible
stain on an interior ceiling where they may be easily seen.
However – they do tend to be constant as once the drip line is
plugged up there will be excess moisture leaking every time the
unit is run. Usually not enough to cause a visible stain – but
just enough and often enough to keep the surrounding wood moist
enough to provide an excellent area for mold to grow. We strongly
advise everyone to have the A/C exchanger checked and serviced on
all properties just for this reason.
 |
 |
|
Base
wall; Visible – typically caused by recurrent
flooding.
|
Interior
of wall; Not visible - typically long-term leak.
|
If you find
Evidence of Mold Infestation:
The latest
consensus of opinions from the EPA, CDC, and environmental
engineers is as follows:
- The
molds and mildews found on most hard – non-porous surfaces
are not of the dangerous types. (This includes tile,
fiberglass, tubs & showers, etc.) Recommended treatment is
simply to wash them down with a solution of hot water and
bleach.
- In
the case of all other treatments/remedies – the source
of the moisture intrusion must first be identified and
corrected before any other work can be completed.
- Areas
of contamination less than 2 square feet are generally not a
major concern, and do not require the services of
professional for abatement. This sometimes includes the areas
under sinks, etc. The affected material can be simply removed
and the surrounding areas washed down with bleach and sealed
with a commercial product such as “Kilz” paint.
- Areas
of 2 to 10 square feet are to be taken on a “case by case”
basis depending on the accessibility and can generally be
treated as above.
- Areas
of 10 – 100 square feet should be inspected and tested by
a competent and licensed professional, but usually can be
treated as above.
- Areas
of contamination of greater than 100 square feet are to be
considered a significant health threat and exposure should
be limited until thorough evaluation and proper testing can be
done by a competent and licensed professional. Any and all
abatement and corrective measures are to be supervised by such
an individual. (Professional Abatement)
Regardless of
your assessment, do not assume that the mold contamination is
benign. If you
discover evidence of mold contamination, the basic rule, as always
is: when selling disclose it and when buying always obtain a
thorough and professional inspection and counsel from the
appropriate professionals
Environmental
Engineers can perform the tests to determine the nature and extent
of the contamination.
recommendation would be to have the buyer use a licensed and
certified engineer who specializes in certification.
This is a relatively new area, and standards for
certification are not yet uniform.
Look for more information either from the County Building
Department, or the “Yellow Pages” under the listings
for “Environmental and Ecological Services”.
If the mold is
visibly present – the environmental engineer will obtain a
sample through scraping the affected area and then analyze it to
see if the mold is potentially harmful.
That is the easy method.
But mold isn’t
always visibly present. Any
water stains or plumbing problems may signify a mold problem
– and that mold problem may be invisible, or inaccessible –
behind the drywall. An
environmental engineer can take an air sample outside of the home
and another air sample inside of the home. If the level inside is
higher than the level outside – the home “may have” (see
below) a mold contamination problem, and that will necessarily
qualify as a “material fact” that affects the prospective
buyer’s decision to purchase.
**** Note
– we have seen several statements and opinions from various
experts that the airborne contamination level tests are highly
prone to “false negative results”.
Therefore we do not recommend that an airborne contaminant test be
relied upon nor should be considered as proof that the home is in
fact uncontaminated and/or safe.
Here’s the
real kicker though. … There is not at this time any type of
federally established safe or dangerous levels on these
contaminants. So no one really knows what level of contamination
is or isn’t safe.
Thus, test
results are quantifiable, but the extent of the hazard is not –
it is a matter of subjective opinion.
Better to let a certified specialist offer the buyer the
opinion and accept the risk of his or her opinion than you.
The costs for these tests can vary widely – but the
airborne tests tend to be in the $500 - $800 range with an
additional $100 - $200 per scraping sample.
Treatment/Cure/Abatement
These mold spores
are very tough and extremely hard to kill. Some of them have been
found to survive 3 or more direct applications of straight bleach.
Furthermore – as stated previously, even inactive or “dead”
spores still contain Mycotoxins and when inhaled –
can still pose a health threat.
For
that reason the older “common” method of washing down the
affected areas with either bleach or vinegar isn’t going to
abate the problem.
The only
recommended abatement method or “treatment” is the removal and
replacement of all affected areas and surfaces. This can get very
costly indeed. So much so that in a severe case (where there is a
serious flooding or moisture problem) it can actually be cheaper
to tear down the entire house and rebuild it, than to try and cure
specific areas.
To properly cure
and correct the problem, every single effected section of the
structure must be removed and replaced. This can typically mean
removing and replacing entire walls, floors, roofs, and ceilings.
Not just the drywall – but the studs, and exterior sheathing
must be replaced as well. The
common under-the-kitchen sink leak that was not addressed by the
former owner for some time can result in mold contamination and
the need for removal and replacement of the entire kitchen area
– at a cost in excess of $15,000.00.
Add this up, and
you have the potential homebuyer looking at a very expensive
repair bill to place the home in the condition “they thought”
it was in when they made the decision to buy it – and would have
addressed by reducing their offer to purchase or even their
decision to proceed with the purchase - had you disclosed the
problem to them.
It bears
repeating: Don’t decide how to identify or cure a fungal
contamination yourself. Don’t
offer an opinion about the type of contamination, the extent of
contamination, or the need for repairs and remediation.
Both the testing for the identification of a particular
mold and the steps necessary for remediation are matters that must
be left to a qualified engineer. Most of the environmental
engineers that perform mold and fungal testing will (for an
additional fee) call the scope of repairs and assist in the hiring
and supervising of the contractors doing the work. On a further
note – most contractors may not be able to perform this type
of work - among other things it requires the use of
“negative air” machines and other specialized skills and
knowledge.
One of the main
problems with the whole issue of mold and fungal contamination is
the fact that with no federally established guidelines and/or
safety limits, and even if you perform all of the work required by
the environmental engineer – you still have no way of proving
that the structure is in fact now safe. It is still a matter of
interpretation.
Using the
environmental engineer’s report, scope, repairs, etc., doesn’t
insulate you because they typically do not warrant repairs to
completely solve the problem, and, because again, there is no
definitive limit or guidelines as what is or is not safe.
Like a bad B-run
movie sequel, the mold can return.
Therefore, the seller must disclose to prospective buyers
all reports, documentation, tests, etc. that you had done on this
property. You
want to assure the buyer the problem has been alleviated.
Don’t do it!
Of course, if the
litigation-prone buyer still proceeds with the purchase and the
mold returns, and in the rare case that produces some illness,
rest assured some attorney will look to hold you accountable for
providing assurances about the problem being corrected.
But neither you nor the buyer, nor his attorney, know if
this problem is related to the old, corrected problem, an entirely
new one, or a previously undisclosed and unknown mold problem.
LITIGATION
AND LIABILITY
With the fact
that several courts have awarded some rather large verdicts in
regard to mold and fungal contamination, there is now ample
precedent already established for damages. The overall consensus
from the attorneys that we have polled regarding this issue is
that you have no guaranteed way of relieving yourself of
liability. With no established federal limits or benchmarks on
what level is or is not harmful, there is no definitive method for
determining what is or is not safe – nor any definitive
guidelines on what is or is not - required to be disclosed.
To add even more
fuel to the fire – the most likely victims are children and the
elderly – both groups being able to pull strong emotional and
sympathetic feelings from a jury.
Many lawyers are
already studying up on this issue and with the intricacies and
size of the damage awards involved. The litigation risks are high.
*** Note
– after surfing the various legal “chat rooms” one evening
– we found over 120 posts specifically dealing with this issue
and the accompanying lawsuits that were either already filed or in
the planning stages.
For these reasons
we expect to see these types of lawsuits becoming more and more
common and we had all better be prepared for them.
Disclose -
Disclose - Disclose.
The “Garden
Variety” “As-Is” addendum may not protect you from
liability - Due to the nature and seriousness of mold
contamination, the demographics of the most common victims, as
well as the current political climate – the general consensus
from the attorneys that we have consulted is that an “As-Is”
addendum probably will not fully insulate you or the seller from
liability.
Known
Contamination.
Back to the 3
“D” ‘s. It has
been recommended that on any property that may have mold or fungal
contamination issues that you immediately disclose the problem,
and any reports or information that you may have on the matter to
all parties concerned especially the prospective purchaser. Not
only should you get written verification of the disclosure, but
have an addendum that holds you and the seller harmless from any
issues that may arise concerning this property – specifically
those that are mold or fungal related.
In these cases
– our thoughts have been to sell the property “As-Is” with
no abatement work, as there is no known way of guaranteeing the
remediation anyway. In this situation - the properties will
typically have to be very heavily discounted.
Have your
attorney draft an addendum for the buyer’s signature that
provides:
(a)
Adequate disclosure of the potential existence of the mold
problem in general terms (including possible locations for hidden
mold growth, such as behind walls, air condition exchange /
condenser units, attics and other inaccessible places;
(b)
Advises the buyer to obtain an inspection from a certified
and licensed environmental engineer;
(c)
That the buyer shall obtain and approve the inspection as a
contingency for purchase (it can be added to the offer as a
contingency);
(d)
That the buyer will obtain the engineer from the Yellow
Pages, the County Building Department, or other source;
(e)
Has the prospective buyer acknowledge the buyer bears the
expense for this inspection;
(f)
That repairs and remediation for mold contamination may
require the removal and replacement of walls, floors, etc. and may
affect the value of the property;
(g)
That the buyer acknowledges that he or she is not relying
on your opinion about the existence, type, or extent of mold
contamination in the property, the need for repairs, or the extent
of those repairs;
Additional
Reference Sources:
California
Department of Health Services, April 1998
http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/deodc/ehib/EHIB2/topics/toxin_producing.html
http://counsel.net/chat/
CDC Questions
and Answers on Stachybotrys Chartarum and other molds
http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/asthma/factsheets/molds/
Beware
the mold Stachybotrys
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9711/05/deadly.mold/
EPA Mold
Resources
http://www.epa.gov/iedweb00/pubs/moldresources.html
Pulmonary
Hemorrhage/Hemosiderosis Among Infants ---
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4909a3.htm
New York City
Department of Health
Bureau of Environmental & Occupational Disease Epidemiology
Guidelines
on Assessment and Remediation
of Fungi in Indoor Environments
http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/doh/html/epi/moldrpt1.html
Household
Fungus Contributes To "Sick Building Syndrome"
http://www.eurekalert.org/releases/aphyts-hfc020499.html
Stachybotrys
Michael
L. Muilenberg
Research Associate/Instructor
Harvard School of Public Health
http://www.aerobiology.org/molds/stachy.htm
Everything
you ever wanted to know about Stachybotrys.
http://www.stachybotrys.net
Toxlaw.com
– Sick building Chat Room
http://toxlaw.com
Miscellaneous:
http://www.a-corp.com/mold.htm
http://www.inspection1.com/stateregulations/index.html
EPA
Limits and Guidelines For Abatement / Remediation
|
Mold
and Indoor Air Regulations and Standards
|
| Standards
or Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for airborne
concentrations of mold, or mold spores, have not been
set. As of December 2000, there are no EPA regulations
or standards for airborne mold contaminants. |
|
Table
2: Guidelines for Remediating Building Materials
with Mold Growth Caused by Clean Water*
|
|
Material
or Furnishing Affected
|
Cleanup
Methods†
|
Personal
Protective Equipment
|
Containment
|
|
SMALL
- Total Surface Area Affected Less Than 10 square feet
(ft2)
|
|
Books
and papers
|
3
|
Minimum
N-95
respirator, gloves, and goggles
|
None
required
|
|
Carpet
and backing
|
1,
3
|
|
Concrete
or cinder block
|
1,
3
|
|
Hard
surface, porous flooring (linoleum, ceramic tile, vinyl)
|
1,
2, 3
|
|
Non-porous,
hard surfaces (plastics, metals)
|
1,
2, 3
|
|
Upholstered
furniture & drapes
|
1,
3
|
|
Wallboard
(drywall and gypsum board)
|
3
|
|
Wood
surfaces
|
1,
2, 3
|
|
MEDIUM
- Total Surface Area Affected Between 10 and 100 (ft2)
|
|
Books
and papers
|
3
|
Limited
or Full
Use
professional judgment, consider potential for remediator
exposure and size of contaminated area
|
Limited
Use
professional judgment, consider potential for remediator/occupant
exposure and size of contaminated area
|
|
Carpet
and backing
|
1,3,4
|
|
Concrete
or cinder block
|
1,3
|
|
Hard
surface, porous flooring (linoleum, ceramic tile, vinyl)
|
1,2,3
|
|
Non-porous,
hard surfaces (plastics, metals)
|
1,2,3
|
|
Upholstered
furniture & drapes
|
1,3,4
|
|
Wallboard
(drywall and gypsum board)
|
3,4
|
|
Wood
surfaces
|
1,2,3
|
|
LARGE
- Total Surface Area Affected Greater Than 100 (ft2)
or Potential for
Increased Occupant or Remediator Exposure During
Remediation Estimated to be Significant
|
|
Books
and papers
|
3
|
Full
Use
professional judgment, consider potential for remediator/occupant
exposure and size of contaminated area
|
Full
Use
professional judgment, consider potential for remediator
exposure and size of contaminated area
|
|
Carpet
and backing
|
1,3,4
|
|
Concrete
or cinder block
|
1,3
|
|
Hard
surface, porous flooring (linoleum, ceramic tile, vinyl)
|
1,2,3,4
|
|
Non-porous,
hard surfaces (plastics, metals)
|
1,2,3
|
|
Upholstered
furniture & drapes
|
1,2,4
|
|
Wallboard
(drywall and gypsum board)
|
3,4
|
|
Wood
surfaces
|
1,2,3,4
|
|
Table 2
continued
*Use
professional judgment to determine prudent levels of
Personal Protective Equipment and containment for each
situation, particularly as the remediation site size
increases and the potential for exposure and health
effects rises. Assess the need for increased Personal
Protective Equipment, if, during the remediation, more
extensive contamination is encountered than was
expected. Consult Table 1 if materials have been wet for
less than 48 hours, and mold growth is not apparent.
These guidelines are for damage caused by clean water.
If you know or suspect that the water source is
contaminated with sewage, or chemical or biological
pollutants, then the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) requires PPE and containment. An
experienced professional should be consulted if you
and/or your cleaning personnel or sub-contractor do not
have expertise in the remediation of contaminated water
situations.
†Select
method most appropriate to situation. Since molds
gradually destroy the things they grow on, if mold
growth is not addressed promptly, some items may be
damaged such that cleaning will not restore their
original appearance. If mold growth is heavy and items
are valuable or important, you may wish to consult a
restoration/water damage/remediation expert. Please note
that these are guidelines; other cleaning methods may be
preferred by some professionals.
Cleanup
Methods
-
Method
1: Wet vacuum (in the case of porous materials, some
mold spores/fragments will remain in the material
but will not grow if the material is completely
dried). Steam cleaning may be an alternative for
carpets and some upholstered furniture.
-
Method
2: Damp-wipe surfaces with plain water or with water
and detergent solution (except wood use wood floor
cleaner); scrub as needed.
-
Method
3: High-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) vacuum
after the material has been thoroughly dried.
Dispose of the contents of the HEPA vacuum in
well-sealed plastic bags.
-
Method
4: Discard _ remove water-damaged materials and seal
in plastic bags while inside of containment, if
present. Dispose of as normal waste. HEPA vacuum
area after it is dried.
Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE)
-
Minimum:
Gloves, N-95 respirator, goggles/eye protection
-
Limited:
Gloves, N-95 respirator or half-face respirator with
HEPA filter, disposable overalls, goggles/eye
protection
-
Full:
Gloves, disposable full body clothing, head gear,
foot coverings, full-face respirator with HEPA
filter
Containment
-
Limited:
Use polyethylene sheeting ceiling to floor around
affected area with a slit entry and covering flap;
maintain area under negative pressure with HEPA
filtered fan unit. Block supply and return air vents
within containment area.
-
Full:
Use two layers of fire-retardant polyethylene
sheeting with one airlock chamber. Maintain area
under negative pressure with HEPA filtered fan
exhausted outside of building. Block supply and
return air vents within containment area.
Table
developed from literature and remediation documents
including Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control (American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1999)
and IICRC S500, Standard and Reference Guide for
Professional Water Damage Restoration, (Institute of
Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration, 1999); see
Resources List for more information
|
_________________
7
Please note that Tables
1 and 2 contain general guidelines. Their purpose is to
provide basic information for remediation managers to first assess
the extent of the damage and then to determine whether the
remediation should be managed by in-house personnel or outside
professionals. The remediation manager can then use the guidelines
to help design a remediation plan or to assess a plan submitted by
outside professionals.
8
Although this document has a residential focus, it is applicable
to other building types.
EPA Web site http://www.epa.gov/iaq/molds/index.html
|